Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Analisis Pengaruh Sosial Ekonomi Terhadap Tingkat Kriminalitas di Indonesia (Studi Kasus 32 Provinsi di Indonesia)

Abstract

In this modern era, a prevalent social issue faced by almost every country is unemployment. Increasing unemployment rates in a region can trigger criminal activities. The objective of this research is to examine the influence of socio-economic variables, namely, unemployment, poverty, education, population density, and per capita GDP in Indonesia's 32 provinces. This study employs quantitative research methods and utilizes secondary data obtained from the Central Bureau of Statistics (BPS). Data panel regression is used for data analysis. The results of this study indicate that unemployment, poverty, education, and population density do not have a significant impact. Only per capita GDP shows a coefficient of -0.539228, indicating a negative influence on the crime rate in Indonesia. However, in the case of the per capita GDP variable, the p-value is 0.0496 < 0.05, signifying that per capita GDP has a significant impact on the crime rate in Indonesia. This means that an increase in per capita GDP leads to a lower crime rate in Indonesia, as higher per capita GDP in a region contributes to economic growth and advancement.

Keywords

Unemploymen, Poverty, Education, Population Denisty, GDP per capita

PDF

References

  1. Anata, F. (2013). Pengaruh Tingkat Pengangguran Terbuka, PDRB Perkapita, Jumlah Penduduk Dan Indeks Williamson Terhadap Tingkat Kriminalitas (Studi Pada 31 Provinsi Di Indonesia Tahun 2007-2012). Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa FEB Universitas Brawijaya. Https://Jimfeb.Ub.Ac.Id/Index.Php/Jimfeb/Article/View/553
  2. Dermawanti, Hoyyi, A., & Rusgiyono, A. (2015). Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Kriminalitas Di Kabupaten Batang Tahun 2013 Dengan Analisis Jalur. Jurnal Gaussian, 4(2), 247–256.
  3. Ega Steviani, H. H. S. M. (2020). Faktor Sosial-Ekonomi Yang Mempengaruhi Tindak Kejahatan Provinsi Sumatera Utara. XIV(01), 42–51.
  4. Kang, S. (2016). Inequality And Crime Revisited: Effects Of Local Inequality And Economic Segregation On Crime. Journal Of Population Economics, 29(2), 593–626. Https://Doi.Org/10.1007/S00148-015-0579-3
  5. Mayssara A. Abo Hassanin Supervised, A., Munawarah, S. H., Misnaniarti, M., Isnurhadi, I., Komunitas, J. K., Rumbai, P., City, P., Komitmen, P., Kbpkp, P., Commitment, S., Kbpkp, F., Dewi, N. M. ., Hardy, I. P. D. ., Sugianto, M. ., 19, T., Ninla Elmawati Falabiba, Anton Kristijono, Sandra, C., Herawati, Y. T., … Kesehatan, I. (2019). Pengaruh Faktor-Faktor Sosial Ekonomi Terhadap Perilaku Kriminalitas Narapidana Di Sumatera Barat. Paper Knowledge . Toward A Media History Of Documents, 7(1), 1–33. Https://Www.Bertelsmann-Stiftung.De/Fileadmin/Files/Bst/Publikationen/Grauepublikationen/MT_Globalization_Report_2018.Pdf%0Ahttp://Eprints.Lse.Ac.Uk/43447/1/India_Globalisation%2C Society And Inequalities%28lsero%29.Pdf%0Ahttps://Www.Quora.Com/What-Is-The.
  6. Nadilla, U., & Farlian, T. (2018). Pengaruh PDRB Perkapita, Pendidikan, Pengangguran, Dan Jumlah Polisi Terhadap Kriminalitas Di Provinsi Aceh. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa, 3(1), 110–118.
  7. Omotor, D. G. (2010). Demographic And Socio-Economic Determinants Of Crimes In Nigeria (A Panel Data Analysis). Journal Of Applied Business And Economics, 11(1), 185–195.
  8. Rahmalia, Ariusni, T. (2009). Pengaruh Tingkat Pendidikan, Pengangguran, Dan Kemiskinan Terhadap Kriminalitas Di Indonesia. 3, 283.
  9. Rahmi, A. (2018). Pengaruh Tingkat Sekolah, Kemiskinan Dan Pengangguran Terhadap Kriminalitas Di Indonesia. 283.
  10. Sukirno, S. (2015). Makroekonomi Teori Pengantar (Edisi Keti). PT Rajagrafindo Persada.